The TRX Newsroom
Product updates. Partnership announcements. Where we'll be next. And long-form perspective on how courts are modernizing the record itself.
Showing 13–24 of 35
California admits to high-risk AI it said it didn't have, Maryland counts more than 50 agencies already using AI, and a legal-tech acquisition extends the consolidation Yale warned about. The thread this edition: adoption is outrunning the transparency meant to govern it.
A written AI policy gives you legal cover and a false sense that the risk is handled. It does nothing to keep sealed court data out of public models. Here is why governing the tools your people already use beats banning them.
Texas's Supreme Court will decide whether an AI-assisted transcript can stand as the official record, California's reporter shortage leaves millions of hearings with no record at all, and a wave of AI-in-court stories circles one question: who is accountable for the record?
Justice AV Solutions (JAVS), a trusted courtroom recording provider with more than 40 years of experience and installations across 17 countries, joins the TRX Partner Program to deliver an integrated workflow spanning the full court record lifecycle.
Redfish Technologies, led by Stuart Herring, joins the TRX Partner Program, bringing more than 25 years of courtroom recording and audiovisual integration across Australia and New Zealand.
TRX TranscriptionPro adds a one-click option to remove filler words, word-level timestamps, automatic Word and RTF drafts on creation, and automatic rejection of incorrectly named uploads.
California courts are quietly piloting an AI 'clerk' that drafts orders and research memos for judges, and the public may never know when it touches a case. Our read on that story and the AI-and-the-law coverage worth your time this edition.
Federal judges weigh the risks, governments pilot AI transcription, and courts test generative tools. Our rank-ordered read on the AI-in-courts stories that matter for the court community this edition.
One Indiana court's move from manual request tracking to a fully automated workflow — and the operational lift that produced.
California's Supreme Court takes up whether banning electronic court recording denies poor litigants a verbatim record, a respected institute reframes access to justice as a burden problem, and the bar debates AI note-takers. Our ranked read this edition.
A quiet news week surfaces a sharp angle: as AI companies build revenue models, courts are next in line to rule on what is and is not permitted. Two links worth your time this edition.
A Yale Law Journal critique of privatized court infrastructure, judges adopting AI with caution, and a court chatbot that stumbled. This edition is about accountability: who controls court technology, and what happens when it falls short.
Stay current
Stay updated with more news from TRX.
We use your email only for the TRX Record. Unsubscribe in one click.
Reading is one thing. A 30-minute walkthrough tailored to your court is another.
